Current:Home > FinanceWisconsin Republicans push redistricting plan to head off adverse court ruling -Wealth Empowerment Academy
Wisconsin Republicans push redistricting plan to head off adverse court ruling
View
Date:2025-04-18 22:22:41
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Assembly is scheduled to pass a hastily introduced redistricting plan Thursday that Republicans say is nonpartisan, providing Democrats with something they’ve been seeking for more than a decade.
Democrats, suspicious of Republican motives, summarily rejected the plan modeled on Iowa’s process, saying it’s all a ruse designed to circumvent the newly liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court from throwing out the Republican-drawn maps.
The drama is playing out amid a continued Republican threat of impeachment against the Supreme Court justice who gave liberals majority control in August if she doesn’t step down from hearing a pair of redistricting lawsuits.
The Republican redistricting bill will almost certainly not become law.
Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who would have to sign it to become law, called the plan “bogus” shortly after its introduction. A veto is all but certain.
Still, Democrats have supported similar redistricting plans in the past.
Evers introduced a system in 2019 for drawing maps that very closely resembles the new Republican bill. Under both plans, staff with the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau would be charged with drawing the maps. If their plans don’t pass after two tries, then the Legislature can make changes the third time through.
That’s how it works in Iowa, where legislative staffers use nonpartisan criteria to draw districts that are then subject to an up-or- down vote by the Legislature and a potential gubernatorial veto.
After the 2020 census, Iowa’s Republican-led Senate voted along party lines to reject the first maps produced by staff, sending them back for another try. The Legislature then accepted the second version, which resulted in Republicans winning all four of the state’s congressional districts in the 2022 elections. Democrats had held at least one district for the previous two decades.
There’s one key difference between what Evers and advocates in Wisconsin — including a coalition pushing for redistricting reform — have been calling for. Under their plans, on the third try it would take a three-fourths majority in the Legislature to pass a map, essentially ensuring it would require bipartisan support.
The Republican bill up for passage Thursday does not include that higher vote requirement. Instead, any changes could be approved with a simple majority.
The higher vote requirement is a critical component of any redistricting change, said Jay Heck, director of Common Cause Wisconsin.
But Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, speaking Wednesday on WisconsinEye, dismissed those concerns, noting that it has worked in Iowa for decades.
“If somehow you think we’re going to sneak through a Republican map that has some kind of favor and get Tony Evers’ signature on it, I think you’re smoking something,” Vos said. “It’s not going to happen. It’s all red herrings. Its all hypocrisy of the left.”
Democrats and those pushing for redistricting reform say it’s Vos and Republicans who are being disingenuous. The plan the Assembly is voting on was unveiled at a news conference Wednesday afternoon. There was no public hearing, and Democrats and advocates say they were not consulted in the drafting of the bill.
“It’s not serious,” Heck said. “This is an act of desperation to head off the Supreme Court from redrawing the maps. ... It just doesn’t pass the smell test on any level.”
Once passed by the Assembly, the redistricting bill would head to the Senate. If approved there, it would then go to Evers, who is expected to veto it.
There are two pending lawsuits before the Wisconsin Supreme Court seeking new maps. Vos has threatened to pursue impeachment against Justice Janet Protasiewicz if she does not recuse herself from those cases because she called the current maps “unfair” and “rigged” during her campaign.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has not said whether it will hear the redistricting challenges. Those bringing the lawsuits want the court to order new maps in time for the 2024 election. Wisconsin’s current maps, first drawn by Republicans in 2011 and then again with few changes last year, are considered among the most gerrymandered in the country.
veryGood! (4262)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Solar Power Just Miles from the Arctic Circle? In Icy Nordic Climes, It’s Become the Norm
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $300 Crossbody Bag for Just $59
- Indiana Bill Would Make it Harder to Close Coal Plants
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Having Rolled Back Obama’s Centerpiece Climate Plan, Trump Defends a Vastly More Limited Approach
- Senate 2020: Mitch McConnell Now Admits Human-Caused Global Warming Exists. But He Doesn’t Have a Climate Plan
- New York opens its first legal recreational marijuana dispensary
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Cultivated meat: Lab-grown meat without killing animals
Ranking
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Chelsea Handler Trolls Horny Old Men Al Pacino, Robert De Niro and More Who Cannot Stop Procreating
- Biden Heads for Glasgow Climate Talks with High Ambitions, but Minus the Full Slate of Climate Policies He’d Hoped
- The precarity of the H-1B work visa
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- A Black 'Wall Street Journal' reporter was detained while working outside a bank
- Rain, flooding continue to slam Northeast: The river was at our doorstep
- Southwest Airlines' holiday chaos could cost the company as much as $825 million
Recommendation
Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
California offshore wind promises a new gold rush while slashing emissions
The Biomass Industry Expands Across the South, Thanks in Part to UK Subsidies. Critics Say it’s Not ‘Carbon Neutral’
These 35 Belt Bags Under $35 Look So Much More Expensive Than They Actually Are
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
A Call for Massive Reinvestment Aims to Reverse Coal Country’s Rapid Decline
How Maryland’s Preference for Burning Trash Galvanized Environmental Activists in Baltimore
Southwest Airlines apologizes and then gives its customers frequent-flyer points